<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Green, Sustainability and the Need for Third Party Validation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aribra.com/green-sustainability-and-the-need-for-third-party-validation/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aribra.com/green-sustainability-and-the-need-for-third-party-validation</link>
	<description>sustainable, development</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2011 20:39:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy R. Hughes</title>
		<link>http://aribra.com/green-sustainability-and-the-need-for-third-party-validation/comment-page-1#comment-240</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy R. Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 22:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aribra.com/?p=1073#comment-240</guid>
		<description>I think your comment has a lot of validity Tommy.  Moving forward, my bet is we see energy efficiency becoming regulated much more aggressively with basic building codes, and even more so with the ICC model green code that is currently chugging along through development.  There will still be a place for LEED, but it may be less central to the sustainable development conversation than it is now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think your comment has a lot of validity Tommy.  Moving forward, my bet is we see energy efficiency becoming regulated much more aggressively with basic building codes, and even more so with the ICC model green code that is currently chugging along through development.  There will still be a place for LEED, but it may be less central to the sustainable development conversation than it is now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Timothy R. Hughes</title>
		<link>http://aribra.com/green-sustainability-and-the-need-for-third-party-validation/comment-page-1#comment-131</link>
		<dc:creator>Timothy R. Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 14:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aribra.com/?p=1073#comment-131</guid>
		<description>I think your comment has a lot of validity Tommy.  Moving forward, my bet is we see energy efficiency becoming regulated much more aggressively with basic building codes, and even more so with the ICC model green code that is currently chugging along through development.  There will still be a place for LEED, but it may be less central to the sustainable development conversation than it is now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think your comment has a lot of validity Tommy.  Moving forward, my bet is we see energy efficiency becoming regulated much more aggressively with basic building codes, and even more so with the ICC model green code that is currently chugging along through development.  There will still be a place for LEED, but it may be less central to the sustainable development conversation than it is now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tommy Manuel</title>
		<link>http://aribra.com/green-sustainability-and-the-need-for-third-party-validation/comment-page-1#comment-128</link>
		<dc:creator>Tommy Manuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 11:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aribra.com/?p=1073#comment-128</guid>
		<description>One should consider taking the $50,000 expense for certification and instead invest it into the project with the goal of exceeding LEED&#039;s grading system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One should consider taking the $50,000 expense for certification and instead invest it into the project with the goal of exceeding LEED&#39;s grading system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: constructionlaw</title>
		<link>http://aribra.com/green-sustainability-and-the-need-for-third-party-validation/comment-page-1#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>constructionlaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 12:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aribra.com/?p=1073#comment-125</guid>
		<description>Great thoughts Tim!  LEED can work, and many of its benefits are not energy related.  However, the ability of the USGBC to make strides toward what most private owners are seeking will be key.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great thoughts Tim!  LEED can work, and many of its benefits are not energy related.  However, the ability of the USGBC to make strides toward what most private owners are seeking will be key.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

